In April and May of 2013, Yale Law professor Dan Kahan — working with coauthors Ellen Peters, Erica Cantrell Dawson, and Paul Slovic — set out to test a question that continuously puzzles scientists: why isn’t good evidence more effective in resolving political debates? For instance, why doesn’t the mounting proof that climate change is a real threat persuade more skeptics?
1More
1More
New Critique Sees Flaws in Landmark Analysis of Psychology Studies - The New York Times - 0 views
2More
What Is Economics Good For? - NYTimes.com - 2 views
3More
Fertility expert: 'I can clone a human being' | Science | News | The Independent - 0 views
4More
'Son of Saul,' Kierkegaard and the Holocaust - The New York Times - 1 views
2More
What If We Lost the Sky? - NYTimes.com - 0 views
3,000 Years of Human History, Described in One Set of Mathematical Equations | Surprisi... - 1 views
‹ Previous
21 - 40 of 144
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page